跳到正文
原文
HuggingFace Daily Papers(社区热门论文)· HuggingFace Daily Papers(社区热门论文)·· 9 天前AI 评分38

EEG 基础模型最适合哪种掩码几何?MAE 与 JEPA 的 58 个模型消融研究

AI 导读

一项研究系统消融了 EEG 基础模型的时空掩码策略,在 MAE 和 JEPA 两种自监督框架下预训练 58 个模型,并在 OpenEEGBench 的 12 个数据集上用线性探针评测。

正文

View PDF HTML (experimental)

Abstract:EEG foundation models hold promise for scalable brain-signal decoding across clinical and cognitive neuroscience applications, yet their pre-training pipelines remain poorly understood. Among design choices, the masking strategy is particularly critical: it determines what the network must predict and from which context. Yet it has never been ablated in isolation, as each new model bundles a new masking strategy with a new backbone and objective. In this paper, we formalize the design choices for spatio-temporal masking strategies and train various models with a single pipeline under varying masking configurations across two SSL frameworks (MAE and JEPA). We then systematically evaluate the resulting 58 pre-trained models on the 12 datasets of OpenEEGBench under a linear probe. Both frameworks agree on an optimal masking configuration and on shared failure modes. Outside these, performance is robust: 11 MAE and 9 JEPA configurations are statistically indistinguishable from the best. We further identify a novel JEPA-specific failure mode, tagged bias-inflation collapse, invisible to standard detectors. With a well-chosen mask, our pipeline reaches REVE-level downstream performance at a fraction of REVE's pre-training compute.
Comments: A controlled evaluation across MAE and JEPA. 44 pages, 12 figures, 15 tables. Project page: this https URL
Subjects: Machine Learning (cs.LG)
Cite as: arXiv:2609.33487 [cs.LG]
  (or arXiv:2609.33487v1 [cs.LG] for this version)
  https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2609.33487

arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

Submission history

From: Pierre Guetschel [view email]
[v1] Sun, 27 Sep 2026 11:55:29 UTC (2,259 KB)

来源:HuggingFace Daily Papers(社区热门论文) · arxiv.org